The age-old question of how people develop a moral sense has been a topic of debate for centuries. Some believe it is instilled in us by God or religious training, while others argue that moral judgment varies according to the culture in which we were raised. However, evolutionary biologist Mark Hauser asserts that our moral sense is part of our evolutionary inheritance, much like our “language instinct.”
Hauser draws his conclusions from experiments with nonhuman primates, as well as from the “Moral Sense Test,” an Internet-based assessment tool administered to 150,000 subjects in 120 countries. Hauser argues that the capacity for moral judgment is a universal human trait, “relatively immune” to cultural differences.
Hauser believes that a key ability in making moral judgments is the capacity to read beneath the surface when observing another creature’s actions. Experiments show that monkeys, apes, and other animals share this ability with humans. It is hypothesized this trait was selected by evolution because being able to perceive another creature’s intentions conferred a survival benefit over animals that could only respond to consequences.
Another important building block in the evolution of a moral sense is cooperation, which takes three different forms in the animal world. The first is cooperation based on kinship. The second is where both individuals receive some cost, but both benefit. The third and rarest type is reciprocity, where an individual gives something up with the expectation that it will receive benefit in the future. The Golden Rule is a formulation in human terms of this adaptation.
According to Mark Hauser, responses to the Moral Sense Test indicate the presence of a moral grammar that exists in all of us and that influences the way we make moral judgments. He found no difference in the way religious and nonreligious people responded to the test, nor did he find differences between men and women. However, the Moral Sense Test measures moral decision-making, not behavior. Where religion and culture do make a difference is in how people judge particular situations.
Overall, Hauser’s argument is that our moral sense is innate and shaped by evolution, rather than solely by cultural and religious factors. While religion and culture may influence our moral judgments in specific situations, the universality of the moral grammar in all humans suggests that our ability to tell right from wrong is deeply ingrained in our nature.
Related posts
Today's pick
Hot topics
Recent Posts
- Transitioning from Military Service to Education: Benefits for Veterans November 29, 2023
- Understanding of several benefits of studying abroad September 27, 2023
- Top 10 Benefits of SEO for Your Business September 25, 2023
- HOW TO ENSURE FOOD SAFETY IN SCHOOL CAFETERIAS August 11, 2023
- From Recruitment To Retention: 10 Ways To Learn Practical Knowledge Of HR Through Courses August 4, 2023
Archives
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- May 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- May 2018
Stay connected